Monday, January 26, 2004
Front Page
News
Op-Eds
Features
Literary
Lighter Side
Letters
About Us
About Romblon
Search
Previous Issues
Links

Join Romblon List
Message Board

Advertise with Us
Contact Us
Feedback

Classified Ads

Contemplations about the EDSA Revolution
By Christopher Mendez

On February of 1986, we revelled at our triumph that was EDSA. We toppled a power that for twenty-one years had put us under his grip, breathless and struggling. We all know his infamous deeds. We all know where he brought our country to: perdition.

Such a leader. I say this for no weakling can put an entire nation under his spell for two decades. But he became Darth Vader. He turned to the dark side. He dragged us, our economy, our wealth and most of all, our attitude into the Dark Ages of Philippine History.

At EDSA we revolted and won.

But did we really win? If so, why did it not deliver us from all of our miseries? My theory is simple. The very essence of EDSA that we are so proud of had failed us. The People's Power Revolution was bloodless, we all know that. We celebrated it and wallowed from its sweet redemption. There was no bloodshed, and for this, our victory was incomplete.

There was no blood to wash away the vices, malice and all the evils brought about by that regime. There were no sacrificial lambs to appease the gods of good governance. We offered our lives but nobody took it.

What about Ninoy Aquino? His blood was the cold water splashed upon our faces to wake us up from the deep slumber of fear and feebleness. It was the spark that sent the drums of war banging across the whole nation, igniting our patriotism. His blood opened a vent for our anger - boiling for more than a score - to be unleashed. Ninoy was not the sacrificial lamb, he was the catalyst; the tip of the sword.

The purpose of Ninoy Aquino was to gather us all together and unite us against the dictator. He knew he cannot go head on collision with the dictator alone. He needed the people to back him up. He attempted and died. And in so doing, gave the Filipino people something dearly to hold on to and fight. We remember him as the one who mustered us to Edsa. When the march began, the memory of Ninoy gave us the courage and the will to stay on and face the tempest. His face was on t-shirts and placards everywhere to remind us that he died for this. His death was the bond that kept the Filipinos united at those crucial hours. It held.

We do not say that Benigno Aquino overthrew the dictator and his government; the People's Power did.

After the vanquished fled and the People's Power Revolution was over, there was much rejoicing. People were dancing in the streets, singing and crying with tears of joy. The mood was festive. The whole nation was equally stunned and overwhelmed by the outcome. He was gone. He simply flew away. Not a shot was fired. Victory.

What happened to the Dictator's iron fist rule that did not mind shooting Ninoy at the back of his head in front of a thousand people? The same rule which nonchalantly dispersed demonstrators with tear gases, smoke bombs, pressurized water from fire trucks, truncheons and even bullets? Why none of these in the hour of great crisis when it is much needed? Did the Dictator chicken out?

He did not. He knew that his time was over. His resistance would be futile. He had half the army and the entire nation marching against him and a handful of his loyal cohorts. He could have made a last stand and died a noble death in battle. Or kill some more people to instill fear among the populace and re-install his government. Or just simply kill; order his men to spray bullets on the mad crowd.

His track record shows he could have done any one of these. But he hesitated. He knew that if he killed some more, this would make the nation and the world angrier. This would make them firmer in their resolve to change the system. The killings would give them something to hold on to, something to fight for and something to remember. The lesser the murders the lesser the people to remember them and the shorter the time to forget them.

And with the decision not to fire and just flee, he removed the fuel that will keep the passion to change burning with fervor. The foundation for a firm will and determination to overhaul the national psyche was robbed from the subconscious mind of the masses. We were stripped of the emotional reason to pursue political and national enlightenment.

A true revolution demands sacrifice. The best thing we did was take the risk.

After Edsa, we still had the chance to make little sacrifices by setting aside personal interests and sentiments and think about the common good for the Filipino people. But the revelry was too blinding. The sweet taste of a swift victory was too intoxicating. The opportunity was too tempting.

Lamentations should have balanced the celebration and brought our minds back to our senses and our feet back to the ground. Just like the vanquishers of old offering the first toast of triumph to their fallen comrades, fortifying their oath and loyalty to the cause in honor of their fellow men who died in battle.

But we didn't have those. No dead to honor and mourn. Instead, complacency crept upon us and shrouded our reason. We thought we were invincible. We thought we could rebuild this country and make it strong again. But we were deceived by our false sense of conquest.

The nation was in ruins. It had to defend the new democracy it just recently gained. Then we installed a housewife at the helm of the new government and hastily ratified an all-new constitution. And with all her political immaturity and callowness, we gave her an absolute power and a term of six years. What were we thinking!

Edsa Dos could not have happened. We couldn't have elected an incompetent actor as president. We could not have had the face to show to those who had sacrificed their lives. But the casualty was zero. We gained our so-called democracy free of charge. We did not pay it with our lives, that is why our efforts in upholding it are not enough to preserve it. With our actions, it is obvious that we take it insignificantly.

Unless blood is again drenched into our land; unless we stumble on the true meaning of sacrifice; unless we loose ourselves and our sons in a fight for true freedom, we will never learn to preserve and savor the true meaning of victory and liberty.

Chris Mendez was a young, idealistic witness to EDSA 1 but a not-so-young witness to EDSA 2. He says he is frustrated at the turn of events so in the Edsa 2 anniversary last January 21, he came up with this.