Monday, June 23, 2003
Front Page
News
Op-Eds
Features
Literary
Lighter Side
Letters
About Us
About Romblon
Search
Previous Issues
Links

Join Romblon List
Message Board

Advertise with Us
Contact Us
Feedback

Classified Ads

GMA's Gala Reception
By Fred Natividad

 

From the nation's capital...

I was not at the welcome gala of President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo to the
White House - heavens, only high society types would ever get into a White House guest list. But from the accounts of at least two Washington, DC newspapers it appears that the state visit of President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo to the capital of the United States was a success.

The hosting American delegation was a very long list of Who is Who among
the capital's cream of society: President Bush and Vice President Cheney
and their wives, selected government big shots, media characters...

There was another group in the American delegation. They stood out as a special group, an eclectic group of Americans composed of a beauty queen, a city mayor, two leaders of a veteran's group, a city council member, a professional country singer, a US army three-star general, and a light flyweight boxer. Some of them tagged their spouses along.

They were Americans of Philippine descent.

The lieutenant general is Pangasinan-born Edward Soriano and the beauty queen is Angela Barraquio from Hawaii's Philippine community who became
Miss America 2001. Country music fans might recognize the name of Neal McCoy, born in Subic Bay of a Filipino mother and an American father.
Boxing fans might also remember Brian Viloria, the Filipino light flyweight boxer in the US Olympic team.

The Washington Post, although one of its top honchos was invited, devoted only a modest coverage of the gala event. The Washington Times, on the other hand, did a more visible coverage but strangely, I did not see anyone from the Washington Times in the guest list. NBC's Tom Brokaw was there but I missed any NBC coverage of the event, if any.

In fact, I missed whatever mainstream TV coverage there was, also if any.

What was noteworthy - this from the Washington papers - was that the Philippines was accorded by the Bush administration the status of a major
non-NATO ally, a status accorded so far to Australia, Egypt and Israel. (I don't understand this. What about Japan?) And the White House state visit gala was only the third since President Bush took office. The previous two were accorded to leaders of Mexico and Poland.

It was the first to an Asian head of state.

The Philippine delegation, on the other hand, had only fifteen people headed by GMA and her husband. There was only one journalist and the rest, while high society types in Manila, were there apparently in their roles related to the state visit in matters of defense, foreign affairs, trade, etc.

However, sometime after the event, the Washington Times put out an unflattering editorial, sarcastically entitled "Christmas in the Philippines." It accused President Arroyo of a mouthful. A barbershop pundit might think the Times was miffed at having been uninvited to GMA's gala welcome.

It recalled how "Manila embarrassed the Pentagon by renouncing a large agreed-upon deployment of US troops to the archipelago - after the the US
Defense department announced the deal."

The editorial also accused GMA and her administration of parroting the French's stand in asking for more time for inspections in Iraq.

"Worse that either of these affronts" the Washington Times editorial continued, "was her bold protest against war during the planning stages last September when the Bush administration was trying to line up allied
support for a strike."

More accusations followed. It cited the Philippine prohibition of US warplanes to refuel in Philippine bases or even to fly over the Philippines during any attack on Iraq. In a classic attitude of patronizing superiority, the Times, in so many words, accused the Philippines of ingratitude, citing how the US sent aid in millions of dollars and thousands of GIs to fight Muslim terrorists in Mindanao.

It was mouthing the trite philosophy that the Philippines, for having been liberated from the Japanese in WW II, owed MacArthur a lot. The Times editorial writers obviously need more research about Philippine "ingratitude."

Whatever happened to quid pro quo?

But to its credit the Times editorial acknowledged the usefulness of the Philippines in the fight against terrorism. Still, in a final shot, it asked "a little bit more fealty from President Arroyo..."

The Times wants Filipinos to be lap dogs. Let's hope the Bush administration does not.


email address: frednati@earthlink.net


Fred Natividad writes from Lonton, Virginia.